Basic Tools: Procedure for the Clean-Up of Burdening Experiences

Procedure for the Clean-Up of Burdening Experiences

English Original Title: HOLOGRAPHIC INCIDENT HANDLING

Comments by Heidrun Beer (see also the comments in the long version of the Procedure for the Resolution of Shocks, as well as in the long version of the Procedure for the Resolution of Mental Masses!)

Short version (without comments, otherwise complete)

The following procedure is designed for the analysis of single burdening experiences. It can also be a chain of similar experiences (for instance several fights at the same school etc.), but not a whole life area or a person.

If however during the Procedure for the Clean-Up of Specific Subjects or during the Procedure for the Clean-up of Failed Life Dreams a single burdening experience comes to view, you can insert the procedure which is described here. Don't forget to completely finish afterwards the rest of the procedure which has been started, if necessary in an additional session!

If the burden which is perceived by your training partner consists mainly of physical pain, make sure that you let him distinguish precisely, which part of the burden has been felt by the body, and which part belongs to the spiritual being. A broken arm for instance could mean for the body "Severe pain in the forearm", but for the spiritual being "Despair because I cannot help the body."

The procedure which is described here addresses the spiritual being, not the body. Please be precise here, and help your training partner – if necessary – with additional questions like "Was this a physical or a spiritual pain?" or "What did you, the spiritual being, feel at this time?", etc. You will see that these two forms of pain often are very different from each other.

If your training parter obviously suffers under the physical pain in an experience, take it up and deal with it. Let him give his answers from the viewpoint of the body, and ask him extra questions for the feelings of the spiritual being.

0. Let the student describe the incident.

1. "When was it?"

2. "Where was it?"

3. "Go to the beginning of the incident."

4. "What is the length of time of the incident?"

5.a "Holographically experience the incident.

With that is meant: like in reality – in three dimensions and with colour, sound, smell, tactile sensations etc., together with all thoughts which have been thought during the incident. It is a complete revival.

When done, ask:

5.b "What happened?"

If the incident was vague or patchy repeat steps 3-5.

6. "Return to the beginning of the incident."

A. "What did you perceive?"

B. "What was your want?"

C. "What was your intention?"

D. "What vision or model did you have?"

E. "What was your plan?"

F. "How did you implement it?"

G. "What was the result?"

Intermediate step: "What other persons were involved in the incident?" Write down all the persons whom your training partner names. Please make sure that he answers the questions which will follow here for each of the persons who were involved in the incident.

If necessary, you can ask additional questions like "What was the want of XY?" etc. Don't be impatient when you are doing that, and don't give your training partner the feeling that he is working in a hasty or sloppy way, if he doesn't tell you all persons at once. Make sure that you are patient, and emanate positive interest and helpfulness.

The now following steps will lead to a situation where your training partner looks at the experience from all sides – not only from his own point of view. This leads to an especially complete understanding of the situation, which is often followed by spontaneous forgiveness. This is it what makes this procedure so much more efficient than other procedures, which might look similar at the first glance.

H. "What did others perceive?"

I. "What was their want?"

J. "What was their intention?"

K. "What vision or model did they have?"

L. "What was their plan?"

M. "How did they implement it?"

N. "What was the result?"

Repeat Steps A through N over and over until the student's mood improves or his attention is freed off the incident.

The student will find a conclusion of total denial of being, doing, or having something. You can assist him by asking:

"What decision did you make as a result of the incident?"

"What have been the consequences of that decision?"

Ask if there are any other decisions, picking up the consequences.

GOING EARLIER

If the person's attention doesn't free up or you do not have an improvement of the mood, check for an earlier beginning or an earlier incident by asking the questions below.

"Is there an earlier beginning?" (with intention)

"Is there an earlier incident?" (with intention)

If the client says "yes" to either question, repeat steps 1 - 6, with the new beginning or the new incident.

Should the student get a heavy feeling or a big amount of blackness or unconsciousness, you could check whether a mental mass is present and run the Procedure for the Resolution of Mental Masses.

Should individual unpleasant sensations occur, you can insert the Procedure for the Resolution of Unpleasant Sensations. In both cases please don't forget to complete afterwards the procedure which had been started, if necessary in an additional session!

NOTE:

1. If the mass is connected to some disreputable incident and does not easily resolve, you can check:
"Are there any pictures or creations in this mass that must not be known?"

Get all, then complete the mass handling.

2. If after running all questions, including the "From where ..." questions, the mass will not dissipate, ask:
"If this mass were to vanish, what are you afraid you would have to be responsible for?"

Get what it is and apply the Procedure for the Enhancement of the Responsibility Level to it, then complete the mass handling.

CONTROL PHRASES:

If the client is being controlled by the incident (cannot see, gets pushed out, gets stuck in it, asserts an irrational position, etc.) ask:

"Is there a precept, command, or control phrase in this incident?"

If so, get what it is and have the client repeat the exact phrase over and over until it unsticks and no longer controls them.

These don't necessarily have to be phrases which are expressed during the incident by other persons (parents etc.), like for instance "You are too stupid to grasp that" (that could act as a control phrase and keep your training partner from understanding and learning even many years later).

Rules or commands to himself (with or without words), which have been formulated by your training partner, can also be control phrases, like for instance "I don't want to see that" or "I cannot endure that". With such intentions he shifts the points not only for the one individual incident, but also for his further life. Don't forget: in the inner world, the own decisions have the rank of laws!

If you are doing well, you can also have your training partner look for the point where he himself promoted the statement of another person into a life rule. Expect a few fine realizations!