Group Consciousness Processing

Article by Heidrun Beer (08-10/1999)

Copyright (c) 1999 - all rights reserved

This article is intended for printing after a period of evaluating feedback. Editing is still in progress. Write to hbeer@sgmt.at if you want to share your ideas!

-  Group Consciousness Processing Recommendations  -

General spiritual illiteracy   --  Specialized spiritual illiteracy   --  Ordinary conflicts or incidents with "single-cell" individuals  --  Missing Group Consciousness Compound  --  Failed Connection Attempts  --  Loss of a Group Consciousness Partner  --  Disfunctional Transparent Channel  --  Synchronization failures with other "multi-cell" individuals  --  Acute pain of one of the compound's member-cells (or a candidate in temporary connection)  --  Parasitic influence of undetected "single-cell" individuals  --  Processing by a "single-cell" processor   --  False Case

 

This chapter is based upon the list of typical case troubles of the "multi-cell" individual as given in the beginning of this article. The descriptions are repeated in order to save you the time to scroll up and down.

 

Remark: This situation is not specific for the "multi-cell" individual. But it is found very often and needs to be addressed first.

Recommended: Most important are study steps which allow the person to gradually understand, experience and exercise their spiritual nature. There is no strong focus on processing steps in this stage, as there will be too little understanding of what happens, and there might be only shallow case access. A general rule is that a person's gains from processing are directly proportional to their understanding of the work which is done.

It would be a mistake though to do no processing at all. It should be used in an informal way in the classroom throughout the whole study in order to provide some practical experience of the spiritual principles which are studied, together with some basic skills in handling common case problems.

More processing is done when the study itself is impeded by case problems - as in upsets with teachers etc. -, and of course always when upsets and catastrophes in life absorb the person's attention so that they would make no more progress in their studies.

 

Recommended: Expanded studies, so that the concepts of "multi-celled" spiritual life-forms are integrated with the existing knowledge and knowhow. If the person has already received processing, it would be important to pick up all case situations which have not been addressed from a group consciousness viewpoint! It might be that the charge which has formed in "private mode" is fully handled, while the charge which has formed around group consciousness principles is still alive and active. This might give the individual very weird feelings, especially if the processor or processing team are not themselves literate in the group consciousness area.

As in the study steps for general spiritual illiteracy, practical exercises should always be part of the training, so that the person gets used to actual processing without any big barriers or preparations.

A great trap in this context is the "I know it all, there is nothing more for me to learn" attitude of coaches or centers where a certain - maybe a high - level of processing knowhow is already given. This attitude has been identified as the most basic and most solid study barrier of all existing study barriers! Especially very experienced processors with a high percentage of successfully handled cases on their records, might be rather unwilling to even look at these additional principles.

We have to keep in mind that the "multi-cell" individual is still a very rare phenomenon, so that these processors might not have seen any of them during their whole career.  They do exist though, and they might show up more frequently in the future, as human evolution progresses and new spiritual structures develop.

 

Recommended: These phenomena are adressed with standard "single-cell" processing, which is already well researched and documented in several schools. An  addition of critical importance though would be to locate and address those events where the client has unknowingly applied "multi-cell" principles to individuals who did not have any "multi-cell" capabilities, so that a situation ensued where the "multi-cell" individual experienced a behaviour as betrayal which the "single-cell" individual can NOT perceive as a harmful act.

In such cases the client should go through study steps and drills which help them to sort out for themselves what kind of people they were dealing with, and how to place them in their understanding of past occurrences. If there is still charge of a "multi-cell" type left, it will be necessary to run it by "multi-cell" principles - not by "single-cell" principles.

The fundamental sequence for a "sorting out drill" follows here. The nature of this drill requires a thorough study of group consciousness principles by the client before the drill is done.

 

Resolving the unknowing application of "multi-cell" principles to "single-cell" individuals

  • Have the client describe the situation holographically (with time, location, duration, all relevant perceptions, sensations, thoughts etc.) Allow them to express any negative emotions which might come up, until they can inspect the situation calmly in order to come to a complete understanding of it.

  • Have the client describe the exact points which caused them an upset, protest or unpleasant sensation, or where they caused something non-optimal to another person.

  • Have the client identify the main synchronization elements which were involved (if they do not know them by heart, the synchronization elements can be assessed from a list, or simply read to them from a list and determined from their reactions and indicators which elements apply).

  • If the client was on the receiving side of the incident, ask alternating/repetitive:

a. "How would a multi-cell individual handle [synchronization element] in this situation?"

b. "How would a single-cell individual handle [synchronization element] in this situation?"

until client has certainty about the differences and similarities of the handling of each synchronization element which was involved in the situation, by both "multi-cell" and "single-cell" individuals. Include study steps if necessary.

  • If the client was on the causative side of the incident (caused a non-optimum experience to another person), ask alternating/repetitive:

    a. "How would a multi-cell individual react to your handling of [synchronization element] in this situation?"

    b. "How would a single-cell individual react to your handling of [synchronization element] in this situation?"

    until client has certainty about the differences and similarities of the reactions to his handling of each synchronization element which was involved, by both "multi-cell" and "single-cell" individuals. Include study steps if necessary.

If the situation which is addressed is not a completed cycle from the past but reaches into present time, a life planning step is necessary so that the client can pull himself out of any non-optimum connections in a responsible way, and replace them with more adequate and fruitful new connections.

 

 

Recommended: There is only one thing which can resolve this condition: Life planning steps which bring the client into contact with as many people as possible who have similar visions and interests. Amongst these people they have the best chances to find other "multi-cell" individuals who might be willing to enter into a group consciousness compound.

It could be that past failed connection attempts have absorbed or "frozen" so much life energy that these incidents have to be run for some time before the client is again dynamic and alive enough to engage in life planning steps. Even a bleeding effect might be found, which is a cause of massive life energy depletion and needs to be resolved with the methods described in the section about the loss of a group consciousness partner.

 

Depending on the type, intensity and duration of the failed connection attempt, its consequences can either be just subjective (sadness, anger or other negative emotions, a feeling of loss, being ashamed about the failure or the own bad judgement or integrity breaks etc.), or there can be additional objective consequences, if the other person has for instance left a girl with an unsupported child, has stolen money, wrecked possessions, ruined a business, or committed similar "single-cell crimes".

A genuine "multi-cell" individual can normally not do such a thing, as they would themselves suffer from the other person's pain which impinges on them on their transparent channel. This is similar to biting off one's own finger - it can't be done, as it is simply too painful: the teeth and the finger are both "part of myself" and linked into the same nerve channel circuit. Beyond a certain (light) level of pain, there is a "biting inhibition" which cannot be overcome.

Exactly the same inhibition can be observed in the (potential) "cells" of a group consciousness compound, which is why people who habitually commit harmful acts can immediately be identified as "single-cells". They might even consider the "multi-cell" individual's "biting inhibition" to be a character flaw, as in a "single-cell" environment where everybody eats everybody this capability of peaceful co-existence would be a sign of reduced survival potential (you just don't allow your lunch to run away and get eaten by some rival).

In order to understand what is happening during a failed connection attempt, we have to keep in mind that connected "single-cell" individuals operate with COMMUNICATION LINES (which bridge a distance between separated awareness units whose spaces do not overlap), while a group consciousness compound operates within SHARED SPACE, spiritually spoken. The unconditional sharing of space deteriorates into the more cautious use of communication lines as the content of the shared space becomes increasingly unpleasant and/or one or more spirits shrink in their spiritual "size" so that empty space (distance) is left between them.

The classic approach of creating and uncreating the critical communication line can therefore not be used as a tool to resolve failed connection attempts (although it is useful as a spiritual exercise). What we have to look at, are the first touching points and then the growing overlapping of spaces (if the connection has developed that far), together with the synchronization elements which have been found incompatible or missing (otherwise the connection attempt would not have failed). 

Recommended: Failed connection attempts sometimes end mildly, but sometimes they also end with a disaster. In case of a disaster, there are basically three steps to do: (1) Repair of physical universe damage, (2) Processing the charge on the client's private sense channels, (3) Processing the charge on the client's transparent channel. If it has not come to a disaster, step (1) can be skipped. 

For the handling of failed connection attempts, some knowledge and experience with the chakra energies is useful. If the client has never looked into this subject, it might be worth the time to insert a study step with a chakra-overview. If this cannot be done or the client is not willing, the processor will have to specify the energy-related question according to his own understanding of the chakras.

(1) PHYSICAL UNIVERSE DAMAGE: If the attempted cooperation or co-creation has ended in physical damage, financial problems or injuries like in cases of child abuse or general family violence, the physical side of it needs attention first. Any injuries or consequences of physical neglect need to be taken to the hospital or the doctor, damage of buildings or vital equipment needs to be repaired, and any financial abnormities need to be stopped, if possible.

That would be the termination of unaffordable contracts, cancelling of unaffordable purchases or any other destructive decisions (like firing important staff etc.), collecting of outstanding money or any other steps which are necessary to keep the operation viable. If damage was done to a business, enough work would have to be invested to keep it from crashing, accumulating bad PR, losing clients etc. Any processing steps have to wait until no more immediate danger exists, which might escalate if time is spent with processing instead of handling the danger.

2.) PROCESSING OF INDIVIDUAL ASPECTS: If the client has been pushed back into a kind of "single-cell" condition - spiritually reduced with a collapsed space and broken or paralyzed connections -, the next step would be to address the immediate impact of violent collisions in session. The same would apply to the devastating neglect which is sometimes the end of a connection attempt. This would be a vital step also for all other people (including children) who were suffering under the foul connection. It would be done with normal shock- or force-handling, incident running and other suitable methods taken from the existing "single-cell" processing repertory.

In this stage it is important to include the handling of the body's viewpoint and any bodyless entities (split-beings to whom charge is "delegated") in the sessions, especially if physical elements were present, so that the body on its own level of aliveness has developed protest- or other charge. That would be in all cases of physical violence and enforced sexual activities as well as in cases of denied sexuality, where the physical and/or spiritual craving for sexual contact and closeness can have reached a very painful intensity.

But the more subtle levels of physical sabotage (as in lack of exercise, poor diet, chemical or noise-pollution in the environment etc.) also need to be checked with the body and any entity who is involved. Part of these handlings would always include an optimization step in the physical universe - it is useless to dissolve negative emotions or other charge, if their root stays in place and no attempt is made to improve the diet, environment or other factors which were the reason for the negative feelings.

After every viewpoint has been run (the client's own viewpoint, his body's viewpoint and the viewpoints of all involved entities), the viewpoint of any group consciousness compound in which the client is participating should be checked too (as the connection attempt can have happened with an already existing group consciousness compound in place). This is done by checking the question "As [name of the compound], what did you perceive?" If another type of incident comes to light, the questions of the procedure are always asked with the prefix "As [name of the compound], [original question]".

Very different answers will come to view. What was a rape for a girl (an incident with physical pain committed by mother's new boyfriend), might have been a shock for the family. We would then run the client on a shock handling with questions like "As the family, how big were you at the time..." etc. The word "you" always addresses the whole compound in these questions; the individual client acts as the compound's "speaker" in such moments. If individual viewpoints show up in the answers, they need to be handled as "parts of myself", not as "another" person.

Let's assume that in the example above the girl's brother gets a session. He has arrived at the point where he runs his sister's rape from the group consciousness viewpoint. The question is "As the family, what did you perceive?", and his answer is "Well, we were all terribly upset and confused. Mother couldn't stop crying, and I had trouble to keep father from taking his gun out of the closet and running out of the house to shoot the guy. Mary [the girl] couldn't walk for a whole day, it must have been really painful for a while. All these emotions flying around, it got our heads spinning."

This example shows the way a group consciousness compound's perceptions are composed from the perceptions of individual members. The upset and enturbulation of the composite falls apart at the moment where it is traced back to the individual impulses which are brought into circulation. The first impression is a confusion, but it clears up quickly if we can bring about a complete understanding of what exactly each member of the group consciousness compound was feeding into the transparent channel (the area of shared perceptions).

It would not be a good idea to spare the running of the group consciousness compound's viewpoint for step (3), where special group consciousness aspects are looked at. We cycle through all viewpoints which are involved in the incident, and the compound's viewpoint is one of them (the biggest). It is logical that the handling is only complete when really all viewpoints have been looked at - the individual viewpoints and any composite ones. 

In the example above, if we had not asked for the family's viewpoint, we might have gotten the mother's despair, the father's fury, the girl's pain and the brother's horror - but the overall confusion, which is perceived in the family's shared perception area, would have been missed by the processor, and might well have remained with the family and distracted and blurred their future activities.  

3.) PROCESSING OF GROUP CONSCIOUSNESS ASPECTS: What we have now, is an apparently recovered individual who lives in a safe environment and whose existence is in pretty good shape again. But although all incidents of usual character seem to be handled, we most probably find the client in a reduced or numb state of connectivity.

The idea of building up new connections might be considered with cautiousness now, with boredom, fear or protest. It might trigger extreme grief or an emotion of pain, and even might produce a new attack of the "bleeding effect".

If new connections have been built at all, they might have a more conservative profile, less blissful, less playful, less intense or less productive than they could be, and their energy composition might be unbalanced as certain frequency zones have been damped out in order to avoid dissonances with the other person, while the connection attempt was still happening (they will not live up again unless re-activated with the explicit intention to restore the original complete spiritual frequency band).

All these things are indiciators that while the charge which was created by the client in "private mode" might have been completely run, there is still charge left on the transparent channel which - as the client belongs to the "multi-cell" variety of spiritual beings - gets activated whenever they try to connect with another.

Such charge can be addressed with the "bleeding effect" method which is described here (hyperlink!), or with the following method for closed (finished) connections. Both are suitable for clients who are still located inside the physical universe, so that they feel the other person to be outside themselves.

Clients who exist and perceive outside the physical universe have much bigger difficulties with failed connection attempts, as they perceive it to be inside themselves and there is no more outside or "elsewhere" to which they could resort. They often live in excruciating and incurable pain until they learn to deal with the negativity or incompatibility of others inside their (no longer limited) space. An exercise or process to get at cause over this problem follows here.

 

Resolving the Group Consciousness Aspects of Connection Failures

This method can be used as long as the client still perceives himself to exist inside the physical universe, so that other persons are perceived outside of himself. Clients who have transcended the physical universe and exist exterior to it, will tend to perceive this procedure as wrong - as it postulates distances which they do not experience anymore.

The procedure might require several sessions. Always end the individual session at a good point.

  • Ask: "Is there a failed connection attempt in this situation?" If yes, continue.

  • Have the client describe the situation holographically (with time, location, duration, moods, intentions, all relevant perceptions, sensations, thoughts etc.) Allow them to express any negative emotions which might come up, until they can inspect the situation calmly in order to come to a complete understanding of it. Ask them to mentally re-create the scenery and keep it there for further inspection.

  • Ask:

  • a. "Where are you located in this scenery?"

  • b. "Where is [name of the other person] located in this scenery?"

  • c. "From where are you trying to connect to [name of the other person]?" Get the exact spot or area in relation to the client's body. If exterior, accept an answer which indicates that the client is aware of the location in relation to their own position.

  • d. "Where are you trying to connect to?" Get the exact spot or area in relation to the other person's body or location as an exterior spiritual being.

  • e. "Are you attempting to create a communication line or a permeation zone?" If client answers that they are creating a permeation zone, ask: "Describe the size and position of the permeation zone and how far it overlaps with the space of [name of the other person]."

  • f. Creative processing step: Ask client to re-create exactly the same communication line or permeation zone. Then to gradually grey it out (make it thinner) until it has disappeared. Then to gradually re-create it again in various degrees of density. Ask client to create a permeation zone instead of a communication line, or vice versa. Ask client to change the connection points of the line or the size and location of the permeation zone. Ask client to make the connection bigger, smaller, longer, shorter etc., and work with other creative processing commands until client has a realization, an expansion in spiritual reach, or an increase in certainty or ability. The un-creation and re-creation of the communication line or permeation zone should be repeated between the other commands.

  • g. Ask: "What messages did you put onto your connection with [name of other person]?" This can be written, spoken, telepathic or any other messages, but not a request for help, contribution or cooperation. For each message described by the client, ask: "Has it arrived?", "Was it acknowledged?" and "How did [name of other person] react?". If only physical reactions are described and client "forgets" to look for spiritually transmitted reactions, specifically ask for intentions, energy flows or -beams with their mood levels, and telepathically projected imagery. Allow client to describe the reactions of the other person. If it is obvious that client can not understand the reactions because they follow "single-cell" principles, ask alternatingly: "How would a multi-cell individual react to such a message?" and "How would a single-cell individual react to such a message?" until client understands the nature of the reaction.

  • h. Ask: "What messages did [name of other person] put onto your connection with them?" This can be written, spoken, telepathic or any other messages, but not a request for help, contribution or cooperation. For each message described by the client, ask: "Has it arrived?", "Did you acknowledge it?" and "How was your reaction to this message?".  If only physical reactions are described and client "forgets" to look for spiritually transmitted reactions, specifically ask for intentions, energy flows or -beams with their mood levels, and telepathically projected imagery. If it is obvious that client can not understand the content or character of the message, ask alternatingly: "What would a multi-cell individual have sent in this situation?" and "What would a single-cell individual have sent in this situation?" until client understands the nature of the message.

  • i. Ask: "What requests did you put onto your connection with [name of other person]?" This can be any form of asking for help, contribution or cooperation. For each request described by the client, ask: "Has it arrived?", "Was it fulfilled?" and "How did [name of other person] react?". If only physical reactions are described and client "forgets" to look for spiritually transmitted reactions, specifically ask for intentions, energy flows or -beams with their mood levels, and telepathically projected imagery. Allow client to describe the reactions of the other person. If it is obvious that client can not understand the reactions, ask alternatingly: "How would a multi-cell individual react to such a request?" and "How would a single-cell individual react to such a request?" until client understands the nature of the reaction.

  • j. Ask: "What requests did [name of other person] put onto your connection with them?"  This can be any form of asking for help, contribution or cooperation. For each request described by the client, ask: "Has it arrived?", "Did you fulfil it?" and "How was your reaction to this request?". If only physical reactions are described and client "forgets" to look for spiritually transmitted reactions, specifically ask for intentions, energy flows or -beams with their mood levels, and telepathically projected imagery. If it is obvious that client can not understand the content or character of the request, ask alternatingly: "What would a multi-cell individual have requested in this situation?" and "What would a single-cell individual have requested in this situation?" until client understands the nature of the request.

  • l. Ask: "During your connection attempt, which energy types did you feed into the communication line or permeation zone?" and "How did [name of other person] react to [specified energy type]?" This question refers to the various energy types as defined in chakra theory. Very spiritually centered people tend to neglect the energy forms which are processed by the lower chakras, which will keep a complete connection from occurring and creates a too narrow range of responsibility (vital life areas are left out from the sharing or exchange of perceptions and requests).

If client is familiar with chakra theory, they might come up with the answer immediately. Otherwise it would be necessary to specify: "Was [energy type] part of your connection attempt?" Repeat this question for all energy types as they are processed by the main chakras:

(1) Physical survival energy

(2) Creative or sexual energy

(3) Bonding energy (Note: Don't worry if client is puzzled about this question. If they made a connection attempt, they have used bonding energy - 3rd chakra energy -, and the answer is obviously yes, so that the question might even be unnecessary. It is left in the list because otherwise it would appear to be missing.)

(4) Love or compassion energy

(5) Logical energy

(6) [Spiritual] Perception energy

(7) [Spiritual] Awareness energy

Cycle through all energy types from (1) to (7). For each energy type which was NOT used by the client, just acknowledge. Sooner or later client should come up with the realization that there is a dead (inactive) area in their energy spectrum, and at this point spiritual exercises can be done which re-activate this energy type.

For each energy type which was used, first ask client to holographically describe the energy with questions like  "How strong is it?", "How fast is it?", "What is its mood level?" etc. Use your own perception in order to decide which attributes to ask for. Make sure that client stays aware of the exact location to which the energy flow is directed.

Then ask: "How did [name of other person] react to your contacting them with [specified energy type]?" If only physical reactions are described and client "forgets" to look for spiritually transmitted reactions, specifically ask for intentions, energy flows or -beams with their mood levels, and telepathically projected imagery. If it is obvious that client can not understand the reaction, ask alternatingly: "How would a multi-cell individual react to such a request?" and "How would a single-cell individual react to such a request?" until client understands the nature of the reaction. The client needs to be sufficiently educated in group consciousness principles in order to perform this step.

Be aware of the possibility that the person whose reactions are analyzed by the client might be a puppet of their culture, so that these reactions are not really their own but pre-programmed by cultural standards. If this appears to be the case, you can ask "Could this be a reaction which is not [name of other person]'s own but pre-programmed by their culture?" If client answers with yes, acknowledge and indicate that this can only resolve if the other person goes through a processing step which is designed to emancipate them from their culture. (This would be a good point to get client interested in their own cultural processing, if this has not been done yet.)

If in the following analysis of synchronization elements "energy" is named by the client, and if it does not resolve with the quantity questions given below, the energy could be further analyzed per the above list of energy types, and/or specific mood levels, and/or frequency patterns.

  • k. Ask: "What synchronization elements have been part of your connection attempt?" If client is familiar with group consciousness principles, they might come up with the answer immediately. Otherwise the elements can be assessed from a list, or they can just be read to the client one by one and determined by their answer or reaction whether they need to be taken up. If the situation already points strongly to a certain synchronization element, it can be taken up first (if a biofeedback-meter is used, the size of the reads determines which element to take up first).

The following sequence needs to be done for each synchronization element which was named by the client. Handle one synchronization element at a time with all of the following questions.

(1) Ask client to describe what state of the synchronization element would have been ideal for them.

(2) Ask client to describe what state of the synchronization element would have been ideal for the other person.

(3) For each synchronization element which has been used and where quantity is the essential factor (as in space, time, intensity, compassion, knowledge etc.):

"Did you offer too much of [synchronization element]? Too little? None at all?"

"Did [name of other person] offer too much of [synchronization element]? Too little? None at all?"

For synchronization elements where not quantity is the essential factor, the questions need to modified. In the case of SPIRITUAL WAVE FREQUENCIES, we would use the questions:

"Was there more dissonance in spiritual wave frequencies than you would tolerate?"

"Was there more dissonance in spiritual wave frequencies than [name of other person] would tolerate?"

"Describe the exact nature of the dissonance".

- and -

"Was the resonance in spiritual wave frequencies below a desirable level for you?"

"Was the resonance in spiritual wave frequencies below a desirable level for [name of other person]?"

"Describe how exactly the resonance dropped below your or their desirable level."

For the synchronization elements VISIONS, LAWS and DIRECTION we need to ask:

"Was your concept of [synchronization element] too different from that of [name of other person] for them to share or support it?"

"Was [name of other person]'s [synchronization element] too different from yours for you to share or support it?"

For the synchronization element TIMING we need to ask:

"Was your timing too different from that of [name of other person] for them to synchronize with you?" "Was it too fast?" "Was it too slow?" If this question indicates, have client describe their own and the other person's timing with some examples until they understand how the incompatibility came about.

Then the other side: "Was the timing of [name of other person] too different from yours for you to synchronize with them?" "Was it too fast?" "Was it too slow?" If this question indicates, have client describe the other person's timing and their own with some examples until they understand how the incompatibility came about.

A very special case - and quite dramatic! - is the connection attempt between two individuals who both have defined themselves as pace-makers. The pace-maker individual is THE synchronizing factor in any group consciousness compound. If their synchronizing capabilities are left idle, the individual might "overheat" as they have nothing to work with. But synchronizing them with each other is not easy either. The processing questions in such cases are - with one exception - always the same for all synchronization elements:

"Did you dispose of [synchronization element] in a different way than [name of other person]?" Allow client to give a complete holographic description with all elements.

"Did [name of other person] dispose of [synchronization element] in a different way than you?" Allow client to give a complete holographic description with all elements.

Only one synchronization element - the pace-maker as such - requires different questions:

"Did [name of other person] attempt to establish themselves as the pace-maker while you were already working as such?"

"Did you attempt to establish yourself as the pace-maker while [name of other person] was already working as such?"

"Was it a failed attempt to synchronize yourself with [name of other person] as parallel pace-makers?"

(4) Let client work out what the similarities and differences of the two ideal scenes were (alternative repetitive), until they attain a complete understanding. Don't stop at the first realization!

The procedure above is used when the connection is no longer open and "bleeding". Otherwise please use the bleeding effect procedure instead.

A list with the processing questions - without the theory - is at the end of this chapter here (hyperlink!).

 

 

Resolving the Group Consciousness Aspects of Connection Failures - for Clients Exterior to the Physical Universe

This method can be used only for clients who have transcended the physical universe and exist exterior to it. Clients who still perceive themselves to exist inside the physical universe, so that other persons are observed outside of themselves, will tend to perceive this procedure as wrong - as it neglects the distances between individuals which are a part of their daily experience.

If client has temporarily been "dotted" (reduced in spiritual "size") or otherwise devastated by the experience with [name of other person],   use the procedure Resolving the Group Consciousness Aspects of Connection Failures, allowing for unusual answers regarding locations. Then continue with step (e) of the procedure which you are reading now.

The procedure might require several sessions. Always end the individual session at a good point.

  • Ask: "Is there a failed connection attempt in this situation?" If yes, continue.

  • Have the client describe the situation holographically (with time, location, duration, moods, intentions, all relevant perceptions, sensations, thoughts etc.) Allow them to express any negative emotions which might come up, until they can inspect the situation calmly in order to come to a complete understanding of it. Ask them to mentally re-create the scenery and keep it there for further inspection.

  • Ask:

  • a. "Where is [name of the other person] located in this scenery?" It is understood that this location is somewhere inside the client's own space.

  • b. "From where are you trying to connect to [name of the other person]?" This will be another location inside the client's own space. The question for the client's own location is not asked, as he perceives himself to be bigger than every existing physical space, so that no outside exists.

  • c. "Where are you trying to connect to?" Get the exact spot or area in relation to the other person's body or location as an exterior spiritual being.

  • d. "Are you attempting to fully permeate [name of other person]'s space, or are you attempting to emulate a communication line?" This question refers to the pretended distance which such a client would sometimes create, in order to avoid an instant overwhelm of another person.

  • e. Creative processing step: Ask client to create a hollow "bubble" around the other person's space. (Size should not be a problem, even if it is very big, as the client lives in an unlimited space and can always make more of it in order to have space for themselves left.)

Ask client to give the "skin" of this bubble an isolating quality, so that it constitutes a completely independent universe which will not interact with client's (surrounding) universe. This can be verified by visualizing the "bubble" having a little spin in one direction and client's surrounding universe either remaining still or maybe even spinning into another direction. There should be no friction or interaction between the two spinning areas; they should not touch at all.

Now ask client to uncreate the "skin" again, so that the content of the other person's universe creates interaction and resonance with client's own (surrounding) universe. Now ask client to permeate the bubble again and fully experience all interactions and resonances with the other person's universe which result from the client's act of permeation. It is important to get him to fully experience everything which "must not be experienced". Ask client to re-create the hollow bubble and observe the changes in interaction and resonance. Ask client to re-create the isolating "skin" and observe any changes in interaction and resonance. Repeat this whole sequence several times, until client can quickly and easily do it and does no longer suffer from the experienced perceptions. End with a step where the hollow bubble is created with an isolating skin.

Now have client permeate the hollow bubble with its isolating skin (encourage them that it is actually possible to permeate the unpermeable!). Have them fully experience the life which is going on inside. Ask client to create a role for themselves inside this universe. Let them live through this role at various mood levels and in both winning and losing valences. Now ask client to un-create this role. Let them create another role and go through the same steps. Between roles, let them un-create their participation in the universe and just be an observer. Or let them un-create their participation and ask them to not-know what happens in this universe. Repeat until no more curiosity, longing, craving, repulsion, protest, pain, other negative mood-levels or compulsive reactions. End with no role for client left in the other person's universe.

Now have client un-create the "skin" of the bubble and confirm the existence of an own independent universe for [name of other person] in client's own space which is just defined by its dimensions. Ask client to practice to permeate and perceive it, and then to un-permeate and not-perceive it. Repeat these two steps until it is no longer painful to touch and permeate this universe.

The step which follows here is done only if the other person is not a greatly destructive influence which needs to be stopped or opposed: Ask client to allow [name of other person] to be the owner of this universe in full sovereignty as long as he wishes. Ask client to conceive of the two connection points of this universe to the universal unity of spirit (one in the past at the beginning and one in the future at the end). Ask client to allow this universe to exist in a separated state between its connection points. Ask client to give themselves a non-interference promise regarding the state of separation and sovereignty of [name of other person]'s universe between the two points in time where they connect to the universal unity of spirit. This promise can also include a decision to not-know what will happen in this universe in the future (not a necessary step - not-know and non-interference don't have to go together in all cases).

Now ask client to play with the proportions of the other person's universe in relation to their own space for a while (without touching or destroying the inside proportions or spacation which have been created by the owner). Let them end with the universe reduced to the size of a dot. Have client store the universe in a location which is comfortable to them and where they can have a look for it if necessary. Have client touch and let go of the universe a few times, until they have certainty that they can find it again whenever they need or want to.

  • f. Ask: "What creations of your own have been pushed out of position by the experience with [name of other person]?" For each creation described by the client, ask: "Where has this creation originally been located?", "Where is it located now?" and "Spot it in your space and locate it at a position where it is comfortable to handle. Do this in a new unit of time." All locations will be inside the client's own space, but the creation's spaces might have been crushed, compressed, "painted" invisible or worthless or with frequencies which are unpleasant for client or which are not part of the client's normal frequency repertory, or they might have been otherwise mishandled. If client cannot easily restore the creations, check for these or further mishandlings and get client to restore the creations in their original dimensions, priority settings and frequency bands. For each creation, let client decide whether it should be re-created in present time, or closed down and allowed to move to the past.

 

 

This "bleeding effect" is actually the result of an automaticity created by the client, which was not "programmed" with the needed accuracy. After the client connected to the partner who is now lost, they decided to add a dimension of TIME to the connection (a duration), but the ending point of the connection was not sufficiently defined.

We often see this in lovers. They promise each other (or themselves) that their love will be "forever" - which means, they cannot see the end of it at the moment where they make this decision. Years later it is painful for them to separate, even after a series of alienations, because this original decision to love each other forever is still there and gets in the way of their having another look at their situation.

The cultural habit of having people promise to stay together "until death will part them" is not very helpful in this context. Certainly death will cut a connection, but which death?

Traditionally, the sentence above is always interpreted in a physical way. But physical death is a very arbitrary thing. It nearly never correlates with the evolution cycles of a spiritual being, which should be the actual governing factor of the beginning, ending and the duration of their connections.

Many partners are finished with each other long before they come even near to physical death. They literally go "out of sync[hronization]", and both of them need new partners if they don't want to be stopped in their personal growth. Others are such a good match that they will look out for each other in their next life, and not finding each other again might give them a life-long feeling of a massive failure.

In any event, if a "bleeding effect" can be observed, the person who experiences it has not been precise in their definition (set-up or programming) of their connection's ending point. The end point is undefined, "fuzzy", or maybe it has not been set at all: in the case of marriages which follow the traditional western pattern, the decision about the connection's ending point has been left up to the surrounding culture, as the partners do not have the feeling that they have the right to replace the traditional "until death will part you" with an ending point of their own creation - which could be as simple as "until we no longer harmonize", "until we start to develop incompatible goals", "until our kids have grown up" or even "until we are bored with each other".

As no end point for the connection has been defined, the client continues to create it beyond the moment where the other side has gone away, separated, divorced, died or turned from an ally into an enemy. We now have the situation where attention, life energy and the willingness to contribute are flowed into a space which is no longer occupied. Their receipt point has disappeared. They end up in emptyness and are no longer acknowledged, answered or returned - the "feedback loop" is broken, and an enormous feeling of wasted life is the result. 

This is very similar to the physical phenomenon of a bleeding wound - therefore the term "bleeding effect". The main element of a bleeding effect is a continuous loop of attention which goes on beyond the point where the target point (in case of a communication line) or the target area (in case of a permeation zone) has been abandoned.

The attention loop consists of the questions "Where are you?" and "What do you need or want?". These two questions are repeated as a package in certain intervals. As long as the connection was intact, there was an echo coming back, which either consisted of quiet perceptions (as in the case of a mother who has a look for her sleeping baby, or a person who lives with a pet and just makes sure with a quick glance that Nero or Kitty are OK), or an explicit answer like "Breakfast, please" or "Thank you, I am fine".

At the moment where the other individual can no longer located, the connection can no longer be kept in an ideal state of tension. It goes slack and leads to the "bottomless" feeling which people tend to have after a substantial loss. Even if they have been very contributing in the relationship, the very fact of their existing connection was not only holding the other side (which is now missing), it was also holding themselves. Now they drift around in a disoriented condition, and even worse: through the ruptured connection the attention loop they have created keeps pumping life energy out into nowhere. It is really very similar to bleeding to death.

Recommended: The nature of the "bleeding effect" logically leads to its handling. There are two possibilities: (1) The connection point or area is lost for the moment, but there was no upset or alienation, so that the connection would live up again if it could be restored technically. This would be the case when a loved family member or a pet dies, gets kidnapped or otherwise diasppears from their usual position.

(2) The other possibility would be that the separation has happened because of spiritual reasons - a betrayal or any other act which lets people recognize that the other person is no longer part of a working connection. In this case the person could even stay physically present - the "bleeding effect" could start nevertheless, as the waste of attention and life energy happens in the same way: the intended receipt point still exists, but it has ceased to function. The results are the same.

Whenever a person has "healed" themselves from a severe loss which was accompanied by a "bleeding effect", they have in some way done one of the two handlings given below, whether knowingly or unknowingly, whether with or without the help of friends or a processor. 

 

Resolving the "Bleeding Effect" after losing a spiritually intact connection

This procedure can be used for both clients who exist inside the physical universe (so that they perceive other people as "outside" and themselves smaller than the entirety of physical space), as well as clients who exist exterior to the physical universe (so that they perceive everybody else inside their own space and there exists no outside or "elsewhere"). The only difference is that for the second kind of client, it must be made sure that no question is asked which would indicate that a location or distance is outside themselves - they must be made to look inside their own space for any locations or distances.

This program might need more than one session. Always end the individual session at a good point.

  • Have the client describe the situation of the loss holographically (with time, location, duration, moods, intentions, all relevant perceptions, sensations, thoughts etc.) Allow them to express any negative emotions which might come up, until they can inspect the situation calmly in order to come to a complete understanding of it. Ask them to mentally re-create the scenery and keep it there for further inspection. Get a perfectly descriptive name for the partner who was lost, which can be inserted into the following questions.

  • Ask: "What regular inflow did you receive from [lost partner], which has now ceased to flow in?" This can be everything between friendly thoughts, spiritual or physical presence and emanations, spiritual or physical support, the partner's activities in their mutual projects (raising kids, running a farm or a business etc.), erotic encounters and energy flows which contributed to the group consciousness compound's energy level and pattern, which now after this contribution is missing might be severely reduced, disturbed or pushed out of balance.

For each regular inflow named by the client, have client give a full holographic description (with time, location, duration, all relevant perceptions, sensations, thoughts etc.) Allow client to fully express all negative feelings which are caused by the loss of this inflow. Then ask "Will you need to replace [named inflow] with something else?" If client's answer is yes, continue: "How can [named inflow] be replaced?" If client cannot come up with an immediate answer, ask them to tell what would be a good time to talk about it again, and schedule a meeting or session for this day or time. Make sure that life planning steps for each regular inflow named by the client are included in the general life planning that you are doing together.

  • Ask: "Do you wish to create the connection to [lost partner] in the new set of circumstances, or do you wish to end it completely and let it move to the past?" If client decides to end the connection and let it move to the past, continue at the step Move to the Past.

Otherwise you might get a sudden explosion of emotions now: How can the connection to a died family member be created again, in any set of circumstances? Reassure client that this is not impossible, as either a spiritual connection can be established right now, or plans can be made to meet again in a new physical form. Ask client to confirm (or change) the decision they made - or make the decision now - , and continue either with the following steps or the section Move to the Past.

RE-CREATE THE CONNECTION:

Repeat this procedure if necessary, but not beyond a point where the client feels that the task of re-creating the connection has been completed (this could already happen during the first run through).

If at any time during this procedure client changes their mind and decides that it will not be possible to re-create the connection, allow them to think about it until they have certainty, and then continue with Move to the Past.

  • Ask: "Where is [lost partner] located now?" If client can not locate the lost partner, even if only spiritually, have client make a decision where to install a relay which can be used as a reference point. Don't allow client to get the illusion that the lost partner is there, if he is not! Ask client to use this reference point like a mailbox - as a representative of the lost partner, not a substitute.

  • Ask: "What parts of the connection have been lost?" This will mainly be physical components - the sight of the body, the sound of the communication, the tactile perception of touching or erotic exchanges, and any kind of work or other contribution which used to be made by the lost partner and now are missing. Allow client to express any negative feelings.

  • Ask: "What parts of the connections are still there?" Some parts of the spiritual connection will still be intact - this is the conductor for the life energy to "bleed out". Ask client to fully describe what is still there from the connection, as their attention might have been fixed upon the parts which got lost, so that the remainders have been overlooked.

  • Do the steps ENERGY BLEEEDING and ATTENTION BLEEDING from the procedure "Move to the Past".

  • Life planning steps which determine how the connection can be re-created in the future. This can be a new attention loop which now goes to a spiritually defined connection point instead of a physical location; it can be a plan to find the lost partner in a new body; or any other steps can be designed to create the connection in the new set of circumstances. Use the questions "What could be done to re-create the connection?" and "What is possible to do now?" to find things which actually can be done, so that client is not hung up in an impossible vision or in a vision which requires many years of waiting (as this would fix a lot of their attention and life energy).

If client feels that the lost partner must be found again, even if it takes many years of waiting and searching, let him work out a time map which also allows for present time projects. In such cases, it would be essential to intersperse the search for the lost partner with business work, physical exercises, spiritual studies, journeys, hobbies or other worthwile activities. Work with the question "What intervals would be right to work on re-creating the connection to [lost partner]?", "What activities would be right to fill the time in between?", and then work out a schedule. If client feels that they need some help or control in order to make all this work, find a friend or make arrangements within your own scene to install a person who will help client to implement their own plans.

MOVE TO THE PAST:

Here our task is simply to "stop the bleeding" and "close the wound". We want to come to a point where all attention and commitment for the lost partner is being handled in a fully conscious way by the client, and all automaticities and habits are brought to light, so that they can be calmly terminated one by one, instead of getting out of control and wasting the client's life energy. Repeat this procedure if necessary, but not beyond a point where the client feels that the task of moving the connection to the past has been completed (this could already happen during the first run through).

  • Ask: "When and where does your connection to [lost partner] begin?" Make sure that client does not describe their first physical meeting, but the actual start of their spiritual connection.

  • Ask: "When and where does your connection to [lost partner] end?" Make sure that client does not describe their physical separation (death, divorce etc.), but the actual end of their spiritual connection. This might have happened just a moment ago in session, or maybe it has not even happened yet, because there are still some things to do. Allow client to give you a future date!

  • ENERGY BLEEDING: Ask: "What energies are you flowing to [lost partner] at this location?" Point to the location which was just described by the client. If they have difficulties to identify or describe the energies, use the list of energy types given above. For each energy type which was named by the client, go through the following sequence:

(a) "Observe yourself flowing [energy type] to [lost partner]". Point to the location where client said that they observe or address the lost partner. Have client turn on the holographic perception of the energy with questions like "How strong is it?", "How fast is it?", "What is its mood level?" etc. Use your own perception in order to decide which attributes to ask for. Then start the exercise:

(b) "Make the energy flow stronger and faster".

(c) "Make the energy flow even more intense."

(d) "Turn the energy flow back in several steps until it is zero."

(e) "Turn the energy flow on again."

(f) "Shift the energy up on the scale of mood levels and describe what happens."

(g) "Shift the energy down on the scale of mood levels and describe what happens."

(h) "Place the end point of your flow of [energy type] on [other location]." Indicate several different locations to client.

Go through the steps (a) to (h) several times, until client can do it well and has a big win (or no more changes).

Now ask "Place the end point of your flow of [energy type] on [location] and turn it on." Indicate various locations to client, near and far, and combine them with "turn it on", "turn it off", "turn it down", "turn it up" etc., until client is very skilled in the whole handling of energy flows. 

During this exercise, allow client to express any emotions and insights. Allow client to tell the lost partner any thoughts or messages which have remained unexpressed during their relationship, whenever they come up.

  • ATTENTION BLEEDING: After the energy exercises are complete, ask: "Prior to your losing sight of [lost partner], what automaticities or habits did you have in place, which had to do with [lost partner] or where you sent attention into his direction?" Make sure that you get not only physical habits like cooking for the partner, going for a walk with him etc., but mainly any permanent attention "loops" which were installed, like "thinking how he is doing", "reaching for her office to see whether she needs anything" and similar. For each automaticity or habit which is named by the client, ask:

(a) "Where in your space did you store the program for this habit?"

(b) "When and where did you install this program?"

(c) "What spaces does it include?" Get all relevant spaces.

(d) "What end-point was designed for it?" It is important to find the end-point in the program's design, as it is very often missing, to that the program cannot be terminated easily (the end-point needs to be defined at design-time). If no end-point has been defined, ask: "What end-point should have been defined?"

(e) "In what intervals did you  go through this program?" (This could be as seldom as once a day or once a week, or as often as once in a minute, or anything in between.) The following steps are a piece of creative processing:

(f) "Go through the program once, right now, and note down the activities in the sequence which you have installed."

(g) "Go through the program once, but do only the steps with even numbers."

(h) "Go through the whole program, but leave out the last step."

(i) "Go through the program once, but do only the steps with odd numbers."

(j) "Go through the whole program, but start with the second step."

(k) "Prepare yourself to go through the whole program, but then do not do it."

(l) "Prepare yourself to go through the whole program, but then do it one minute later than you had planned."

(m) "Go through the whole program, decide when to go through it next and do it like planned." Give client something to do for the time in between - reading a text, going for a coffee, or whatever else they want to do to fill the time.

(n) "Go through the whole program, decide when to do it next and then don't do it."

(o) Repeat some of these creative processing steps, but not in the same sequence as before.

  • It might be that this sequence can be done in one session, or that there are so many or they are so extensive that more than one session is needed. In any event, give the client some homework before you send them home after the last session for the day: ask them to inspect their home for more habits which might come to mind in the familiar environment, to write them down step by step and either go through the creative processing sequence as before, or bring the writeup into the next session so that it can be done with your help.

  • After all habits and automaticities have been found and processed, ask client to select some of them and do the creative processing sequence outside of session, in actual life, on their own - first without any distractions, then in the middle of business work or whatever they are doing during their day. Have client give you daily reports. Do this step only if there is still evidence of unresolved habits!

  • Have client spiritually seize the whole connection like an object. Have client let go of the connection, like they would let go of an object. Repeat this several times. Then have client put the connection into several points in time - yesterday, tomorrow, today, a century ago, a century in the future, etc. End with a step where you ask client to find a place and time where to store the connection. Ask client to store the connection at the selected place and time and let go of it. Ask client to find the connection again in order to be able to access it for any data they might want to use in the future. Ask client to store the connection again and let go of it. Repeat this until client has certainty that they can do this at any time without difficulties.

  • Life planning steps, until client has found to their satisfaction what to do with the free ressources (time, attention, willingness to contribute etc.) which now are no longer wasted into a non-existent connection, and has successfully implemented these new plans in real life. This might require a few "trial and error" cycles, as not every idea will fully work out in the first attempt. Ask client to come back to you for more sessions or life planning steps, until they are fully oriented and established in their newly designed life.

 

 

Resolving the "Bleeding Effect" after a connection went bad

Here our task is simply to "stop the bleeding" and "close the wound". We want to come to a point where all attention and commitment for the lost partner is being handled in a fully conscious way by the client, and all automaticities and habits are brought to light, so that they can be calmly terminated one by one, instead of getting out of control and wasting the client's life energy. Repeat this procedure if necessary, but not beyond a point where the client feels that the task of moving the connection to the past has been completed (this could already happen during the first run through).

This procedure can be used for both clients who exist inside the physical universe (so that they perceive other people as "outside" and themselves smaller than the entirety of physical space), as well as clients who exist exterior to the physical universe (so that they perceive everybody else inside their own space and there exists no outside or "elsewhere"). The only difference is that for the second kind of client, it must be made sure that no question is asked which would indicate that a location or distance is outside themselves - they must be made to look inside their own space for any locations or distances.

This program might need more than one session. Always end the individual session at a good point.

  • Have the client describe the situation of the betrayal or failure holographically (with time, location, duration, moods, intentions, all relevant perceptions, sensations, thoughts etc.) Allow them to express any negative emotions which might come up, until they can inspect the situation calmly in order to come to a complete understanding of it. Ask them to mentally re-create the scenery and keep it there for further inspection. Get a perfectly descriptive name for the partner who betrayed them, which can be inserted into the following questions.

  • Ask: "What regular inflow did you receive from [lost partner], which has now ceased to flow in?" This can be everything between friendly thoughts, spiritual or physical presence and emanations, spiritual or physical support, the partner's activities in their mutual projects (raising kids, running a farm or a business etc.), erotic encounters and energy flows which contributed to the group consciousness compound's energy level and pattern, which now after this contribution is missing might be severely reduced, disturbed or pushed out of balance.

For each regular inflow named by the client, have client give a full holographic description (with time, location, duration, all relevant perceptions, sensations, thoughts etc.) Allow client to fully express all negative feelings which are caused by the loss of this inflow. Then ask "Will you need to replace [named inflow] with something else?" If client's answer is yes, continue: "How can [named inflow] be replaced?" If client cannot come up with an immediate answer, ask them to tell what would be a good time to talk about it again, and schedule a meeting or session for this day or time. Make sure that life planning steps for each regular inflow named by the client are included in the general life planning that you are doing together.

  • Ask: "When and where does your connection to [lost partner] begin?" Make sure that client does not describe their first physical meeting, but the actual start of their spiritual connection.

  • Ask: "When and where does your connection to [lost partner] end?" Make sure that client does not describe their physical separation (break-up, divorce etc.), but the actual end of their spiritual connection. This might have happened just a moment ago in session, or maybe it has not even happened yet, because there are still some things to do. Allow client to give you a future date!

  • ENERGY BLEEDING: Ask: "What energies are you flowing to [lost partner] at this location?" Point to the location which was just described by the client. If they have difficulties to identify or describe the energies, use the list of energy types given above. For each energy type which was named by the client, go through the following sequence:

(a) "Observe yourself flowing [energy type] to [lost partner]". Point to the location where client said that they observe or address the lost partner. Have client turn on the holographic perception of the energy with questions like "How strong is it?", "How fast is it?", "What is its mood level?" etc. Use your own perception in order to decide which attributes to ask for. Then start the exercise:

(b) "Make the energy flow stronger and faster".

(c) "Make the energy flow even more intense."

(d) "Turn the energy flow back in several steps until it is zero."

(e) "Turn the energy flow on again."

(f) "Shift the energy up on the scale of mood levels and describe what happens."

(g) "Shift the energy down on the scale of mood levels and describe what happens."

(h) "Place the end point of your flow of [energy type] on [other location]." Indicate several different locations to client.

Go through the steps (a) to (h) several times, until client can do it well and has a big win (or no more changes).

Now ask "Place the end point of your flow of [energy type] on [location] and turn it on." Indicate various locations to client, near and far, and combine them with "turn it on", "turn it off", "turn it down", "turn it up" etc., until client is very skilled in the whole handling of energy flows. 

During this exercise, allow client to express any emotions and insights. Ask client to locate any promises and commitments made to the lost partner and terminate them in the spiritual universe, whenever they come up. Ask them to inform the lost partner about their terminating the promises or commitments, if they feel that this would be necessary in order to complete the cycle.

  • ATTENTION BLEEDING: After the energy exercises are complete, ask: "Prior to your losing sight of [lost partner], what automaticities or habits did you have in place, which had to do with [lost partner] or where you sent attention into his direction?" Make sure that you get not only physical habits like cooking for the partner, going for a walk with him etc., but mainly any permanent attention "loops" which were installed, like "thinking how he is doing", "reaching for her office to see whether she needs anything" and similar. For each automaticity or habit which is named by the client, ask:

(a) "Where in your space did you store the program for this habit?"

(b) "When and where did you install this program?"

(c) "What spaces does it include?" Get all relevant spaces.

(d) "What end-point was designed for it?" It is important to find the end-point in the program's design, as it is very often missing, to that the program cannot be terminated easily (the end-point needs to be defined at design-time). If no end-point has been defined, ask: "What end-point should have been defined?"

(e) "In what intervals did you  go through this program?" (This could be as seldom as once a day or once a week, or as often as once in a minute, or anything in between.) The following steps are a piece of creative processing:

(f) "Go through the program once, right now, and note down the activities in the sequence which you have installed."

(g) "Go through the program once, but do only the steps with even numbers."

(h) "Go through the whole program, but leave out the last step."

(i) "Go through the program once, but do only the steps with odd numbers."

(j) "Go through the whole program, but start with the second step."

(k) "Prepare yourself to go through the whole program, but then do not do it."

(l) "Prepare yourself to go through the whole program, but then do it one minute later than you had planned."

(m) "Go through the whole program, decide when to go through it next and do it like planned." Give client something to do for the time in between - reading a text, going for a coffee, or whatever else they want to do to fill the time.

(n) "Go through the whole program, decide when to do it next and then don't do it."

(o) Repeat some of these creative processing steps, but not in the same sequence as before.

  • It might be that this sequence can be done in one session, or that there are so many or they are so extensive that more than one session is needed. In any event, give the client some homework before you send them home after the last session for the day: ask them to inspect their home for more habits which might come to mind in the familiar environment, to write them down step by step and either go through the creative processing sequence as before, or bring the writeup into the next session so that it can be done with your help.

  • After all habits and automaticities have been found and processed, ask client to select some of them and do the creative processing sequence outside of session, in actual life, on their own - first without any distractions, then in the middle of business work or whatever they are doing during their day. Have client give you daily reports. Do this step only if there is still evidence of unresolved habits!

  • Have client spiritually seize the whole connection like an object. Have client let go of the connection, like they would let go of an object. Repeat this several times. Then have client put the connection into several points in time - yesterday, tomorrow, today, a century ago, a century in the future, etc. End with a step where you ask client to find a place and time where to store the connection. Ask client to store the connection at the selected place and time and let go of it. Ask client to find the connection again in order to be able to access it for any data they might want to use in the future. Ask client to store the connection again and let go of it. Repeat this until client has certainty that they can do this at any time without difficulties.

  • If client is exterior to the physical universe, it might be a good idea to use other creative processing steps instead - those which are given in the Failed Connection Handling -, in order to fully get at cause over the situation.

  • Life planning steps, until client has found to their satisfaction what to do with the free ressources (time, attention, willingness to contribute etc.) which now are no longer wasted into a non-existent connection, and has successfully implemented these new plans in real life. This might require a few "trial and error" cycles, as not every idea will fully work out in the first attempt. Ask client to come back to you for more sessions or life planning steps, until they are fully oriented and established in their newly designed life.

 

Recommended: For too little perception of the group consciousness compound's feelings, all known processes and spiritual exercises can be run which are aimed at the improvement of spiritual perceptions. Additionally, the following procedures can be used:

 

Improving the Quality of Spiritual Perceptions (1)

The following procedure is not designed to remove negative energy from a person's case. It is an exercise which is aimed at improving their perceptions of another person, spiritual being or group consciousness compound.

Normally it would be used by persons who are not exterior to the physical universe, so that they perceive others outside of themselves. But it can be adapted for persons who exist exterior to the physical universe too. The changes are mentioned in the relevant paragraphs.

  • Ask: "Locate [name of a person, life-form, spirit or group]." In the following paragraphs, we will refer to this consciousness as [located   consciousness].

  • Ask: "Observe the boundaries of their space." You want the client to describe a 3-dimensional "bubble" of space which is inhabitated or controlled by [located consciousness].

  • Ask: "Find a contact point or zone on the surface of this space which feels safe for you to touch." For a client who exists outside the physical universe, this is preceded by: "Create a hollow bubble around this space and make sure that you do not permeate it". The hollow bubble should be somewhat bigger than the observed space, so that there is a distance to bridge between the client's space and that of [located consciousness].

  • Ask: "Create an extension of yourself into the direction of this contact point or zone, until it touches the contact point."

  • Ask: "Observe the instant where the perception of [located consciousness]'s presence sets in."

  • Ask: "Gradually let go of the contact point or zone until the perception of [located consciousness]'s presence disappears."

 

If no perceptions have turned on, repeat the following sequence:

(a) Ask: "Touch the contact point or zone until you perceive a connection."

(b) Ask: "Increase the energy of your touch until you begin to perceive [located consciousness]'s presence."

(c) Ask: "Decrease the energy of your touch until you no longer perceive [located consciousness]'s presence."

If this is still difficult to do, try the following exercise:

(1) Get a tuning-fork from a music shop.

(2) Borrow a violin, guitar or another music instrument which has a resonance body.

(3) Hit a table's edge with the tuning fork so that it begins to swing. Then - quickly! - press the handle against the resonance body of the music instrument, so that the fine sound of the tuning-fork is multiplied by the music instrument and becomes loud and distinct.

(4) Repeat this exercise, but now demonstrate a fast series of pressing the tuning-fork against the instrument (the sound turns loud) and releasing it from the instrument (the sound turns less loud or is no longer heard at all). Repeat this a few times during the few seconds where the tuning-fork continues to swing, maybe one cycle in a second.

(5) Hand the tuning-fork to your client and ask them to do the same thing without your help.

(6) When they understood the action and can do it easily, ask them to observe the increasing pressure which is applied to the tuning-fork in order to make the resonance body swing.

(7) Ask client to perform the same action spiritually during the perception exercise you are doing together. If a permeation happens instead of a mere contact, ask them to observe what is going on and let them exercise contact (touching) and permeation alternatingly, until they can do both knowingly and can handle the perceptions which turn on.

 

 

 

Improving the Quality of Spiritual Perceptions (2)

The following procedure is not designed to remove negative energy from a person's case. It is an exercise which is aimed at improving their perceptions of another person, spiritual being or group consciousness compound.

It can be used for clients inside of the physical universe as well as clients outside the physical universe.

  • Ask: "Locate [name of a person, life-form, spirit or group]." In the following paragraphs, we will refer to this consciousness as [located   consciousness].

  • Ask: "Now be [located consciousness]." This is NOT done by touching the other person across a distance, but by placing oneself in their location and completely tuning in to their pattern of spiritual energy frequencies, while letting go of the own frequency pattern.

  • Ask: "Describe how you feel as [located consciousness]." This should include physical perceptions as well as emotions, thoughts, intentions and every beingness which can be observed in [located consciousness].

  • Ask: "Not be [located consciousness]."

  • Ask: "What is different?" Ask client to give you a full description of the difference between being themselves only and being the other person as well.

 

Repeat these steps with several persons, life-forms, spirits or group consciousnesses until client can easily do it and has certainty about their ability to spiritually perceive others. These sessions can be repeated in regular intervals. They can be done regardless of any other processing actions, whenever client has sufficient time and free attention.

     

 

Dealing with an Overwhelming Excess of Spiritual Perceptions

The following procedure is designed to create or improve a person's control over their spiritual perceptions, which sometimes come in in such an overwhelming multitude, volume or density, that normal functions of life are disrupted and a comfortable existence is no longer possible.

It can be used for clients inside of the physical universe as well as clients outside the physical universe.

  • Ask: "Observe an incoming spiritual perception."

  • Ask: "Describe it." Have client give you a complete holographic description with direction, intensity, volume, colours, wave-patterns, mood-levels and any images, intentions or thoughts which are transported by the incoming flow or beam as a carrier wave.

  • Ask: "Where is the source of the things you perceive?" Narrow it down in several steps until the location is precise, based upon the direction which was already determined in the previous step.

  • Ask: "Who is the source of the things you perceive?"

  • Ask: "Blank out this specific perception while not touching others." This is not done with force or effort, but by creating an exact duplicate (this includes being the source of it, with its whole identity and history).

  • Ask: "Turn it on again until it is exactly the same as before."

  • Ask: "Make this perception stronger." Ask client to play with various factors - such as mood level, volume, intensity, direction, or the positions in time and space -, and change them as with the volume control on a radio. If this is difficult, allow them to approximate the perception by offering them some object as a substitute and asking them to handle it with their hands. The object must be handled with the understanding that it is only a visible pointer to the actual perception.

  • After a while (can need several sessions) of this exercise, ask: "Now turn [specific perception] down in volume until it has a comfortable level." It is helpful to have a list of perceptions which have appeared during the program so far. Repeat this with all perceptions until client is comfortable.

  • Ask: "Now turn all of them on again to their original volume." After this is done, ask: "Turn [specific perception] off completely and tell me whether you are comfortable." If client still has overwhelming perceptions coming in, repeat the same question with other perceptions from the list, until only so few perceptions are coming in that client is comfortable. Have client observe that they can control the comfort level either by turning down the volume of all perceptions, or the number of perceptions they will allow to come int.

  • Ask: "Now turn off [specific perception]." Repeat until all perceptions are turned off.

  • Ask: "Turn [last perception turned off] on again and perceive it fully." Have client describe it again. After this is done, ask: "What would have to happen in this context to create a positive change?" Make a list of the harmful acts or "acts of omission" which now will come up and have been the reason that client got overwhelmed by the incoming perception. Make VERY sure that you get WHOSE harmful act or omission it is - it might not be the client's own! It might be that of another person, a split-being, or that of a "single-cell" hierarchy or a group consciousness compound the client belongs or belonged to.

Example: client keeps receiving telepathic messages from starving kids in Africa. The answer to the "What would have to happen" question might be: "We [the US or Europe] would have to send them more money for food!", etc. Then take up "Not sending money for food to Africa" with your standard harmful acts handling, always using the correct identity (the client himself, a split-being, a "single-cell" hierarchy or a group consciousness compound they belong to).

Repeat with all perceptions on the list.

     

 

This type of charge is not perceived outside of oneself. It is perceived like a pain in one's body, when a failure in coordination has led to an injury. A twisted ankle would be an example: the leg and the foot move into directions which they cannot move into at the same time. The result is a painful distortion of the ankle, maybe ruptured muscle fibres or veins, resulting in an effusion of blood or other tissue liquids.

In the spiritual perception, some manifestations would be: tension, friction, frequency dissonances and - most prominent - synchronization "incidents" which are perceived as painful by the "multi-cell" variety of spiritual beings.   Tension (two or more parts of the compound pulling into different directions) or friction (two or more parts of the compound moving in a different speed, with a different intensity or following different visions) are experienced during an ongoing operation over a prolonged time, while synchronization "incidents" bring the activity to an at least temporary halt.

All synchronization failures are built on the same concept of unplanned separation. It is the same when a bone breaks: Cells are separated (broken up) which should be firmly connected and synchronized. As on the physical plane, the three main reasons for sychronization injuries are (1) being unskilled (too little trained or too unexperienced) to stay synchronized; (2) randomity (unexpected interaction with other forces) and (3) open opposition (fights) or hidden opposition (sabotage). 

Recommended:

Resolving the Pain and Learning the Lesson from any Synchronization Failure

  • Have the client describe the situation of the synchronization failure holographically (with time, location, duration, moods, intentions, all relevant perceptions, sensations, thoughts etc.) Allow them to express any negative emotions which might come up, until they can inspect the situation calmly in order to come to a complete understanding of it. Ask them to mentally re-create the scenery and keep it there for further inspection. Get a perfectly descriptive name for the partner who was at the other side of the synchronization failure, which can be inserted into the following questions.

  • Assess for the synchronization element[s] which was [were] going "out of sync". This can be done by reading the list of synchronization elements to the client while they are on a biofeedback-meter, or with a brief discussion of each synchronization element - this will reveal whether it is part of the situation or not. Of course it also can be that the client comes up with the involved element right away - especially if they are already familiar with and experienced in the work with group consciousness principles.

    With each synchronization element found, go through the following sequence:

  • Ask: "Duplicate the movement which was done by you exactly before you experienced the synchronization failure, and tell me about it." If the synchronization element in question was "Direction", this question can be answered literally. Otherwise it would have to be applied metaphorically. For instance in a case of a frequency dissonance, the answer could be "I changed to a lower mood level". There is always a change to observe, and it is not just happening, it is DONE BY THE PERSON. So it adds up to a movement, even if it is spiritual and has no physical elements.

  • Ask: "Duplicate the movement which was done by [partner] exactly before you experienced the synchronization failure, and tell me about it." If there was more than one other individual involved, get the client's answer for each of them.

  • Ask: "Now duplicate both (all) movements simultaeously." Wait for the client to do it, then ask: "What happens?" Now we should be able to have the involved pain or other negative emotion in plain view. Ask client to move a bit before this moment time-wise and then repeat the re-creation of the simultaeous changes until it becomes possible to experience them.

  • Ask: "What part of the vision which is shared by you and [partner] are you aligned with in this moment?"

NOTE: In this step - or the second vision question asked below - it might become obvious that either one of the individuals or both did not have a vision of their own making in place. They might have adopted it from the compound, or maybe from a cultural "template". This is often seen in marriages where the partners adopt the generally accepted cultural rules instead of defining their own "constitution" as an independent entity.

If this happens, the installation of a mutual and agreed upon vision must follow as soon as possible (without disturbing the session or leaving processing actions incomplete). This will most probably be done in a life planning step which has no other purpose than to provide the vision at a late stage of an activity. While it ideally should have been defined at the beginning, it is still better to provide it later than to omit it completely.

In some cases, it will be found in this life planning step that the visions of the involved individuals are not compatible and cannot be aligned by any means. In such a case, a break-up will be unavoidable. This might seem rough, but actually it brings the prerequisites to both individuals to act on their own visions instead of living in somebody else's footsteps. The will find partners who are a real match and their lives will improve, after the first chaos of the breakup has settled.

If a break-up seems to have very serious consequences (as in the case of a couple with small kids), an attempt can be made to run more sessions around the "incident" of a synchronization failure in "vision".

  • Ask: "What would be your ideal movement in this moment?"

  • Ask: "What consequences does or will it have that you did not act this way?"

  • Ask: "What part of the vision which is shared by you and [partner] is [partner] aligned with in this moment?"

  • Ask: "What would be [partner]'s ideal movement in this moment?"

  • Ask: "What consequences does or will it have that they did not act this way?"

  • After the loop of synchronization elements is complete (if more than one), ask: "What would have to happen so that this situation does not repeat?" Get all data and note them down for any life planning steps. This can be forwarded to [partner] as well, if they are interested.

  • Ask: "What did you learn from this experience?"

  • Ask: "What else could you learn from this experience?" Repeat until the situation is completely understood and has no more teaching potential.

  • Ask: "Did this experience inspire you as to any new creations in life?" If so, suggest a complete new life planning so that no valuable vision or intention gets lost.

 

 

Not always does physical distance play an important part, although it sometimes does. Examples would be a member of the compound who has to travel and gets injured, or who gets lost after an accident and cannot find anything to eat or drink, until the sensations of hunger and thirst are getting to the extreme pain of torture. A similar torture-like pain can be the result of sexual starvation, if the member has to stay outside of the physical boundaries of the compound and is therefore not included in their chosen model of sexual interaction - the specific pattern of caring for sexual needs which has proven successful for them.

In a physical distance we also find candidates for the particular group consciousness compound who are not yet fully embedded in the group and just in a state of mutual exploration whether they might be compatible or not. Such individuals, especially if they are true "multi-cell" individuals yet had to live outside any group consciousness compound for a long time - maybe their whole life -, are often in a desparate condition (see "Missing Group Consciousness Compound"), maybe even so desparate that they seem to operate below a level where they qualify for the compound's happy and positive level of operation.

In such a situation it would be a mistake to continue the compatibility tests regardless of the existing painful condition, as they will inevitably come out with a false result (too low average performance, apparency of despair, hopelessness etc., which in a functioning compound would fall away completely). It is necessary to embed the candidate into the group consciousness compound "as if" he were already a member, and to emulate the compound's abundant and caring life circumstances for him, until the pain has moved out of the way and the individual's true personality can come to view. If he lives in a physical distance, the compound can either invite him for a temporary visit, or make a visit themselves until the compatibility tests can be completed.

The situation is different for a member of the compound who suffers from acute sickness or is on the road to a not very peaceful death, as in the case of cancer or other painful diseases.  The compound has to face the fact that there will always be some "cells" who get hurt or have to die, if they reach the natural age limit. The compound needs to care for both, the member in pain and the rest of the group, whose performance would be impeded by the constant pain impulses which are flooding the transparent channel.

Recommended:

Caring for a member in pain:

Several things can be done. For the individual cells - those which are not hurting themselves - as well as the pace-maker, who probably has to take the biggest share of the pain impulses, the general rule is to go into an outflow-mode most of their time, and make it a positive outflow. As long as they outflow positive energy, optimistic vibes, useful contributions and helpful activities, the incoming waves of pain are less likely to disturb their well-being and reduce their performance.

The pace-maker, who has to receive the pain impulses if he wants to stay perceptive, which is a necessity for his being functionable as a pace-maker, can help himself by taking each packet of incoming pain impulses, re-tuning the received energy into a confident and positive pattern, and sending it back to the member or members who is/are in pain. Of course he also needs to act, or to coordinate the actions of other members, in order to repair the situation or at least alleviate the pain.

One of the most important things for a pace-maker to do in such a situation is to carefully examine his "clock-functions" - the coordination and sychronization which he normally provides to the members of his compound. The incoming pain impulses will have a tendency to concentrate his attention on the one (or few) member or members who are in pain. Nothing is a bigger temptation for a pace-maker to lose the balanced state of his attention and neglect those members of the compound who are not in pain at the moment.

They are in no trouble yet, but they still need the coordinating functions of the pace-maker; if the pace-maker ceases to perform, they too might be in trouble soon! The one thing which needs to be absolutely avoided, is the equation "sick member = sick pace-maker = sick compound". Here the unity idea works into the wrong direction: the smaller "cell" makes the whole compound sick, either by direct impact or by making the coordinating pace-maker sick who then allows the rest of the compound to fall apart.

The compound needs to work into the other direction: they need to radiate their healthiness and happiness to the sick member until he recovers, or has completed the unavoidable step of dying. It is solely a matter of osmotic flows. The compound needs to find a way to make their positive energy stronger than the sick member's painful energy.

Physically, everything needs to be done to do away with any negative sensation. Whether it is food, liquid, noise reduction, a diet correction, sleep, exercise, sexual interaction or medical treatment including pain-killing activities which are indicated, it is the pace-maker's responsibility to assess the exact combination of necessitites and make sure that they are provided in the most efficient way. If the situation requires the delegation of a member whose job it is to exclusively care for a sick or dying member, this member needs to get especially intense care to keep him from developing burnout phenomena, and if possible there should be a rotation pattern where several members of the compound share this exhausting task.

In a situation where the group consciousness compound is too small and/or does not have sufficient resources to fully accomplish the above, the choices are to either go through a time of reduced well-being and performance as a whole, or to disconnect from the member in pain.

For such a situation, no recommendation can be made, as all factors need to be evaluated and weighed by all involved members in present time in order to come to a responsible decision which will not leave a valuable individual alone in cruel and unbearable circumstances.

If the member is actually a candidate (not a member of the compound yet but in the stage of compatibility tests), his potential value has to be included in these considerations. But in both cases - that of a member or a candidate - all individual "cells" of the compound need to be included in the decision-making, as the pace-maker alone cannot be burdened with making such a potentially heavy decision on behalf of the compound.

 

 

The best parasite is one which is never found, because it has learned the art of "mimicry" - the perfect duplication of the environment. Some life-forms have developed this to a level of perfection. The butterfly who looks like the leaf of a tree will not be eaten by a bird; the fish who is able to duplicate the pattern of the ocean ground will not be seen by his natural enemy and will survive, where other - more visible - fish have no chance to escape a shark or a dolphin.

The parasitic "single-cell" spiritual being is actually a criminal who makes a living from the work, life-energy and accomplishments of others. But this never happens in an open, detectable way like a housebreaking or robbery. The parasite settles happily and visibly in the middle of the spiritual life-form he has decided to exploit, and emulates their habits and appearance with such a perfection that it is easy to believe that he is actually a part of the team.

In the "single-cell" hierarchy the parasite can only be detected if the contributions and exchange patterns of all group members are examined. The parasite can be found because he mainly consumes, but produces either low quantity or low quality or both. He will also tend to form a network of allies with whom cheap expressions of friendships are exchanged - he makes his friendship into a "coin" which is valuable to have, and lets people compete for it.

This "friendship" consists of nothing but hot air, but it feels and sound good, and some people will not look through the fake and give actual life-energy and actual support to the parasite just in order to get or maintain his precious "friendship". But when the moment comes where they would need this support and life-energy returned to them, they will find that they have nothing to expect from the parasite but a cold and uncaring shrug.

In a group consciousness compound, the parasite is easier to locate. It is the individual who does not pick up the perceptions of needs and pain which other individuals feed into the transparent channel, and therefore will not offer any help or assistance, product or other input to a person who has signaled their "hunger".

While the genuine "multi-cell" individual is very sensitive to things like equal rights between genders, equal freedoms and duties between members of a production team etc., the parasite will attempt to gather total rights and total freedom for himself, but will avoid any duties as much as possible. The only limit here is that he has to maintain his mimicry. If a 100% self-centered behaviour would expose him at once, he will mask it sufficiently and will pretend to contribute to others enough to create the impression of being a good team member.

People with telepathic abilities can detect a parasite by picking up his often absolutely brutal and ruthless energy flows. He can be so brutal and ruthless because he is not able to feel another person's pain. There also exist some parasites who will not appear to be ruthless. They  have polished their "mimicry" to such absolute perfection, that they will "emulate" all typical emotions and behaviour pattern of other team members. But there is a very distinct overtone hovering around them, something like a continuous broadcast of the message "I am faking all this!", which again can be picked up by telepathic individuals. It is as if they were telepathically warning us against their evilness - surprising, but then again also not so surprising, as every spiritual being is basically good and will try to protect others against the harm they might inflict on them.

If a strongly parasitic "single-cell" parasite cannot be processed and educated into a team member - be it in a "single-cell" hierarchy or a group consciousness compound -, it would be a mistake to allow him to stay in the team. He will behave like cancer in a body, who ruthlessly grows at the cost of all legitimate body parts. In the attempt to fight and remove the cancerous tumour, a body will finally kill itself. The same can happen to a team, if they have not found a way to make a clean cut and move the parasitic individual out of their space. 

Every parasite depends on the host organism's defective immune system in order to stay undetected, survive for any longer time and even procreate and cause the starvation of the host organism at an increasing speed.

In the spiritual organism the same is true for the spiritual parasite. Instead of procreating, he will bring out the ruthlessness in other individuals if they see him exploit the compound's resources at their cost, observe that it is tolerated and remains uncorrected, and finally decide that this might be a more rewarding way of living in the team. By contagion, he destroys their willingness to share and turns them back into "single-cells" at least, if it does not get worse and they decide to team up with him and become a parasitic group (tumor).

If something like that happens, the team's "immune system" has failed. The team would have been obliged to protect the majority of constructive members by removing the parasite. But where a group consciousness compound is spiritually literate and has learned to detect and exclude parasites soon after they have first tried to invade the team, no permanent harm needs to happen. Of course the exclusion does not need to be as brutal as in nature, where the body will kill and digest a detected cancer cell or other parasitic life-form. A polite and civilized way of showing them the door should do the job.

Recommended: The "single-cell" parasite has many similarities with the Failed Connection Attempt, at least as far as the consequences and outcome of their activities are concerned. The main difference is that in the failed connection attempt, the connection was (mainly) created by the "multi-cell" individual, while in the parasite scenario it is the "single-cell" who initiates the connection. But beware! Very sophisticated parasites will manipulate the "multi-cell" individual so cleverly that they believe it is them who does the connection!

The processes given in the Failed Connection Attempt chapter can all be used to handle the spiritual side of the damage caused by a parasite. But more important than any processing in session is to handle the parasite's physical universe damage with absolute thoroughness and care. It must be brought to a full completion with no loose ends, or the parasite might find a way to further exploit its former host organism.

If the parasite had rallied "friends" around him, whose substantial contributions he exchanged with his cheap and worthless (but sometimes very convincing) apparency of "love" - a faked emanation rather than any valuable support -, they might suffer quite a bad time after the parasite has been removed from the team and his luxurious energy flows have ceased to get distributed as a reward, like a kind of "spiritual money". Any such loss could be treated with the procedure Resolving the "Bleeding Effect" after a connection went bad .

 

This situation is difficult to resolve, as spiritual teachers have a tendency to believe in their teachings and will not easily perceive that there is something missing in their approach, especially if they have a high success rate and only very few failures. If now something in their policy or staff hurts the advice-seeking "multi-cell" client, they will fail to perceive his pain, as they do not have the functionality of the shared perceptions on the transparent channel.

For the client - who after all is looking for an understanding, teaching and guidance which is superior to his own, so that he can use it to improve his own spiritual skills - this creates a logical paradox. This person or group promotes themselves as having the potential to guide him; they might even quite proudly ask for substantial amounts of money; yet obviously there is something about his nature which they do not understand, cannot handle and - worst of all - refuse to observe in the first place.

This happens most often where the client and the coach, processor or center belong to different cultural classes. The client would need advice and processing based upon his own set of precepts, whereas the coach, processor or center have no experience with this set of precepts. Instead, the client might even collide with their set of precepts. An example would be a gay client who is contacting a center run by "normal" heterosexual people, or a student in a low income range who wants to get trained by a coach who is used to high pay.

In such a situation, a coach, processor or center with "multi-cell" capabilities would have at least a temporary link with the client and handle him in such a way that no pain is caused to him, or that a solution for his difficulties is worked out in some way. A "single-cell" team might neglect the client's needs and feelings - whether unspoken or openly expressed - in such a rude way that they inflict new pain on him instead of helping him to get at cause over his old painful conflicts and situations.

Recommended: The client needs to understand that as a "multi-cell" individual, he cannot expect complete and reliable spiritual help or guidance from a team of "single-cell" individuals.

Cooperation with "single-cell" persons or hierarchies is basically possible in normal life, if they are goodhearted and integer. But where a relationship of spiritual student/coach is needed, or where a client needs processing, even goodhearted and integer "single-cells" can only partially help a "multi-cell" individual, because they do not understand his group-consciousness dimension.

The fatal problem is that the student or client can never know when their guidance will suddenly fail, and when their answers will suddenly be wrong. They might have a lot of "single-cell"-related knowledge, and many of their solutions might work very well, but suddenly and without warning they might make some serious mistake or feed him with data which do not apply to his personality or his life.

The same is true for a coach, processor or center who is a "multi-cell" individual, or where "multi-cell" individuals are present, but their training has not included any theory of,  or practical work with "multi-cell" principles. Such people are partially spiritually illiterate. They might be highly successful experts in handling "single-cell" spiritual beings, but in the area of group consciousness they are beginners, or sometimes not even that.

A coach, processor or center of high integrity and responsibility might respond to a client's wish to expand their foundation of knowhow by studying and training group consciousness principles. If they refuse such a training step or even criticize or belittle the client's ideas and requests, it will be better to find a different team.

Past experiences with "single-cell" coaches, processors or centers, which the "multi-cell" individual has found painful or disappointing, can be processed with the procedures for the Failed Connection Attempt. If the client has invested a lot of life-force and personal commitment, or has built strong connections to teachers, coaches or processors who later betrayed him, the procedure Resolving the "Bleeding Effect" after a connection went bad can be used.

 

From this situation a multitude of complications can arise. The simplicity of it is that the "multi-cell" individual violates essential life rules of the "single-cell" individual just by applying its own essential life rules, and vice versa. They are not compatible. The only way of co-existence for them is the complete understanding of each other's nature, and a behaviour code which establishes a common ground on which both can operate safely.

Summarized, the "multi-cell" individual will offer instant contributions to others as well as expect instant contributions to self, both based upon the (often unspoken) perception of each other's needs. Their offers might be experienced as enforced by some "single-cell" individuals, and their expectations might be experienced as usurpation, measured against the "single-cell" individual's major values of freedom and independency.

At the other hand, the "single-cell" individual's denial of the "multi-cell" individual's expectations might be experienced as sabotage or at least egoistical and selfish by the "multi-cell" individual, as their natural behaviour code is based upon sharing of resources and products, and the other person's needs are perceived as part of the own needs.

There is no essential difference between a pain in the left hand and a pain in the right hand, or between an oxygen hunger in the left leg or in the right leg. Both need to be cared for in a balanced way, as both are "part of myself". The fact that the separated "single-cell" individual simply does not have this thinking pattern and will not be able to follow it, might be incomprehensible for the "multi-cell" individual for whom it is the natural way of thinking.

The consequence is that each of them accuses the other of massive harmful acts, but they will NOT find "own similar" patterns in their own case (which would be the instinctive next question for any experienced processor). The perceived harmful acts are simply the expression of a different (and incompatible) type of spiritual life-form.

We have an analogy for this in nature, where some organisms require an environment with oxygen, and others require an environment without oxygen. They are something like "natural enemies"; not because they eat each other or fight each other, but because their optimum life circumstances are mutually exclusive: Where one of them has an ideal survival basis, the other would die, and vice versa.

Actual harmful acts are rare in the genuine "multi-cell" individual, as they immediately perceive the pain they cause to the other person on their own transparent channel (see paragraph about the Biting Inhibition). If there are any at all, they will have happened as a mistake because of missing knowledge, or they are harmful omissions which are done by "swimming with the current" of the culture, or they are committed in extreme conflict situations.

Recommended: If a scene of mutual accusations between a "single-cell" and a "multi-cell" individual has become very serious and solid, both of them should be advised to go through the following steps:

 

A nearly identical situation of mutual accusations can arise where two "multi-cell" individuals act based upon very different (and incompatible) concepts, visions or laws (defined by themselves and/or their culture), or where they are both pace-makers with a very different timing.

In this case, the suggestion that they might be "single-cell" individuals will not indicate or even cause a vehement protest. The handling given above would still apply, only that both of them would have to handle their failed connection attempts with "Synchronization Processing".

In rare cases, one "multi-cell" individual or a whole compound might act as a parasite in another compound. It will act like a "single-cell" individual within the other compound, but have a workable group consciousness model going inside the own compound. The parasite handling applies.

Such a behaviour is either based upon flagrant spiritual illiteracy (these people do not know "what makes them tick") or on a lack of spiritual perception (they cannot see that others follow a similar pattern) or extreme stupidity (it has not dawned on them that another spiritual life-form has equal rights to exist and survive).

They also might have made it their game to fight or "eat" (exploit and destroy) other compounds. In this case their understanding is still too narrow to conceive of an ultimate organism which - although consisting of many different and independent "organs" - is one superior self which has no more outside, and that each spiritual life-form has their place within this organism and plays their part in its huge and controversial system.

Maybe we are looking at the body of the supreme being here, and if our spiritual progress and the advance of our many levels of sychronization are fast enough and good enough, one day we will have managed to find back to the whole we once came from, and re-develop into the oneness which keeps waiting for us beyond today's horizon.

 

- oder lesen Sie mehr auf unserer

- or return for more information to our

This page last changed on: 30. Mrz 13